nBirmingham.net
Birmingham Campaign of 1963
The climax of the modern
civil rights movement occurred in Birmingham. The
city's violent response to the spring 1963
demonstrations against white supremacy forced the
federal government to intervene on behalf of race
reform. City Commissioner T. Eugene "Bull" Connor's
use of police dogs and fire hoses against nonviolent
black activists, led by Fred L. Shuttlesworth and
Martin Luther King, Jr., enraged the nation. The
public outcry provoked President John F. Kennedy to
propose civil rights legislation that became the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. The act opened America's
social, economic, and political system to African
Americans other minorities,
including women, the handicapped, and gays and
lesbians. The legislation addressed the principal
goal of the movement of gaining access to the system
as consumers but also set in motion strategies to
gain equality through affirmative action policies.
Having witnessed the organization of theMontgomery
Bus Boycott, Shuttlesworth organized his own group,
the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights (ACMHR),
in June 1956 after the state outlawed the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
In December 1956, when the federal courts ordered
the desegregation of Montgomery's buses, Shuttlesworth asked the
officials of Birmingham's transit system to end
segregated seating, setting a December 26 deadline.
He intended to challenge the laws on a bus on that
day, but on the night of December 25,
Klansmen bombed Bethel Baptist Church and parsonage,
nearly assassinating the reverend. He emerged out of
the rubble of his dynamited house and led a protest
the next morning that resulted in a legal case
against the city's
segregation ordinance. Coinciding with school
desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas,
Shuttlesworth arranged a challenge to Birmingham's
all-white Phillips High School in September 1957,
nearly suffering death at the hands of an angry mob.
Segregationist vigilantes again greeted
Shuttlesworth when he desegregated the train
station. In 1958, Shuttlesworth organized a boycott
of Birmingham's buses in support of the ACMHR legal
case against segregated seating. Shuttlesworth's
aggressive strategy of direct action alienated him
from Birmingham's established black leadership. Many
people in the black middle class found as too
extreme the intense religious belief held by ACMHR
members that God was going to end segregation.
Prompted by the national sit-in movement begun by
four black college men in Greensboro, North
Carolina, in February 1960, a group of black
students in Birmingham fromMiles College and Daniel
Payne College held a prayer vigil. Shuttlesworth and
the ACMHR supported their efforts. When a national
group of black and white demonstrators undertook the
Freedom Ride in May 1961, Shuttlesworth and the
ACMHR provided assistance, rescuing the stranded
protesters outside
Anniston as well as those who suffered a Klan
attack at the Birmingham Trailways Station. In
spring of 1962, Birmingham's black college students
initiated the Selective Buying Campaign and, with
support from Shuttlesworth and ACMHR, which became
the catalyst for the spring 1963 demonstrations.
Chosen as secretary of the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)
when it organized in 1957, Shutttlesworth had been
an active member of the region's leading civil
rights group. But he was frustrated because he
believed that the SCLC lacked clear direction under
King's leadership. Shuttlesworth watched the SCLC
intervene in Albany, Georgia, in 1961 and fail to
successfully challenge segregation in a manner that
forced reforms in local race relations. Aware that
King's reputation had suffered from this defeat,
Shuttlesworth invited the SCLC to assist him and the
ACMHR in Birmingham. Believing that a success would
restore his reputation as a national civil rights
leader, King agreed. Shuttlesworth hoped King's
prestige would attract the black masses and thus
mobilize Birmingham's black community behind the
joint ACMHR-SCLC campaign.
Leaders from the ACMHR
met with SCLC officials to plan strategy. Having
learned from prior mistakes, King's lieutenant, the
Reverend Wyatt Tee Walker, proposed a limited
campaign of sit-ins and pickets designed to pressure
merchants and local business leaders into demanding
the city commission repeal the municipal segregation
ordinances. Some scholars have argued that the
strategy called for violent confrontations with
Bull Connor leading to mass arrests that would
force the Kennedy Administration to intervene on
behalf of civil rights, but this was not the case.
The tactic of filling the jail had failed to alter
race relations in Albany, and the noncommittal
Kennedy Administration had yet to offer support for
the movement and in fact had aided the
segregationists. Indeed the best ACMHR-SCLC could
hope to achieve was some modicum of change in local
race relations that might point the way toward
regional reform of the South's segregated social
structure.
The joint ACMHR-SCLC
Birmingham campaign began quietly with sit-ins on
April 3, 1963, at several downtown "whites-only"
lunch counters. From the outset, the campaign
confronted an apathetic black community, an openly
hostile established black leadership, and Bull
Connor's "nonviolent resistance" in the form of
polite arrests of the offenders of the city's
segregation ordinances. With no sensational news,
the national media found nothing to report, and the
campaign floundered. But when Connor ordered out
police dogs to disperse a crowd of black bystanders,
journalists recorded the attack of a German shepherd
on a nonviolent protester, thereby revealing the
brutality that underpinned segregation. The episode
convinced Walker and King to use direct-action
tactics to generate creative tension for the sake of
media coverage. The ease with which the campaign
changed directions reflected the fluidity of the
movement. Shuttlesworth led the first of many
protest marches on City Hall to emphasize the
refusal of the city commission to issue parade
permits to the protestors. As the number of
demonstrations increased, police arrested more ACMHR
members, consequently draining the financial
resources of the campaign. Black bystanders gave the
campaign the appearance of mass support, but the vast majority of
Birmingham's black residents remained uninvolved. A
more serious threat came from established black
leaders who opposed the civil rights campaign and
actively worked to undermine Shuttlesworth by
negotiating with the white power structure. Although
King's decision to seek arrest marked a turning
point in his life as a leader, it did little to
increase support for the faltering ACMHR-SCLC
campaign. From behind bars, he penned the "Letter
From Birmingham Jail," which became the clearest
statement on the righteousness of civil rights
protest. But after a month of exhaustive
demonstrations, the stalemate with white authorities
suggested another Albany and the looming defeat of
the Birmingham Campaign.
In a desperate bid to generate media coverage and
to keep the campaign alive, King's lieutenants
launched the Children's Crusade on May 2, 1963, in
which black youth from area schools served as
demonstrators. Trying to avoid the use of force,
Bull Connor arrested hundreds of school
children and hauled them
off to jail on school buses. When the jails were
filled, he called out fire hoses and police dogs to
contain large protests in the black business
district along the city's Kelly Ingram Park. African
American spectators responded with outrage, pelting
police with bricks and bottles as firemen opened up
the hoses on not just the nonviolent youngsters but
also on enraged black bystanders who had nearly
begun a riot. The media captured the negative images
of Connor and his men suppressing the nonviolent
protest of school children with brutal blasts from
water cannons and attacks from police dogs.
Front-page photographs in the nation's newspapers
convinced President Kennedy to send Assistant
Attorney General for Civil Rights Burke Marshall to
Birmingham to secure negotiations that would end the
violent demonstrations. Previous federal policy
regarding civil rights issues had left enforcement
to local law and order officials without direct
intervention by the national government. At first,
Marshall succeeded in fashioning a similar
resolution by convincing
King to call off the
protests without winning any real concessions from
the local white power structure. Shuttlesworth held
out for more concrete results, and his opposition
led to a re-evaluation of the terms for an ultimate
truce that announced limited local race reforms.
The national media attention helped to spread the
fervor of the ACMHR-SCLC Birmingham Campaign well
beyond the city's borders, and national
demonstrations, international pressure, and inner
city riots followed in the wake of the agreement.
These actions convinced a reluctant Kennedy
Administration to propose sweeping reforms that
Congress ultimately passed as the Civil Rights Act
of 1964. With this legislation, the civil rights
movement achieved its goals of gaining access to
public accommodations and equal employment
opportunities, thereby ending acquiescence to white
supremacy and opening the system to African
Americans and other minorities. In hindsight
the moderate success of inclusion only expanded
access and did not alter or challenge the class
structure, thus leaving movement members with a
wistful sense for the need for economic justice. In
the years that followed, white resistance
exaggerated the significance of the limited racial
inclusion.
White vigilantes attempted to scuttle the race
reforms by bombing sites related to the civil rights
struggle. When court-ordered school desegregation
arrived in the city in September 1963, Klansmen
bombed theSixteenth Street Baptist Church, killing
four black girls. Only with the implementation of
the Civil Rights Act, adopted the next year, did the
city completely desegregate, and then only following
the U. S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Heart of
Atlanta Motel v. the United States case, which also
involved Birmingham's Ollie's Barbecue. When Congress passed the Voting Rights
Act in 1965 many African Americans in Birmingham won
the right to vote for the first time, foreshadowing
a sea change in local politics. Although members of
the black middle class and working class enjoyed
access to the system, many African Americans
remained shut out, having gained little from the
reforms won in Birmingham.
Nevertheless, the appointment of
Arthur Shores to the city council in 1968 and
the election of Richard Arrington as mayor in 1979
represented the strength of the growing black
electorate and the success of black political
empowerment that grew directly out of the Birmingham
campaign.
|